罗生门 9/22/2010 13:07
闭关收获甚多。

又看了一遍罗生门。人确实很好玩,而且很 predictable.

参加了一个 seminar,一位网络前辈说网络 privacy is not important, but dignity is. Very well said. 牛

So many experiments to do. The key seems to be to minimize risk. Treat people as 小白鼠 and make them 感恩戴德, that's the definition of philanthropy in the western world.
xiaoqiang :
闭关收获甚多。

又看了一遍罗生门。人确实很好玩,而且很 predictable.

参加了一个 seminar,一位网络前辈说网络 privacy is not important, but dignity is. Very well said. 牛

So many experiments to do. The key seems to be to minimize risk. Treat people as 小白鼠 and make them 感恩戴德, that's the definition of philanthropy in the western world.


一直想画一幅罗生门引发的构思,一直没找到时间 frustrated
wildcrane at 9/22/2010 13:15 快速引用
xiaoqiang :


So many experiments to do. The key seems to be to minimize risk. Treat people as 小白鼠 and make them 感恩戴德, that's the definition of philanthropy in the western world.


I strongly disagree. Do you want to be treated liked that?

If the answer is no, then I can say 几所不欲,勿施于人.

If the answer is yes, then I don't see the point of minimizing risk. The point should be to maximizing the pleasure for your master.
Bono at 9/22/2010 13:59 快速引用
I am stating a fact.

I see an influential micro-financing web site that he sets up in China. According to him, he is operating in a gray area of the law. He has done similar things in other parts of the world, and in the seminar, some 黑色小白鼠 defends his conducts.

I don't like this guy in person. He is a 童话作家 under the disguise of a cow boy. He is very kind in appearance but very rude in heart. But what he does is common practice.

Luckily he is challenged by one of the old audience and has to close his presentation before the debate got out of control.

Of course, I don't think you can understand these things. No offense but I think it is a waste of time to argue with you.

Bono :
xiaoqiang :


So many experiments to do. The key seems to be to minimize risk. Treat people as 小白鼠 and make them 感恩戴德, that's the definition of philanthropy in the western world.


I strongly disagree. Do you like to be treated as that?

If the answer is no, then I can say 几所不欲,勿施于人.

If the answer is yes, then I don't see the point of minimizing risk. The point should be to maximizing fun for your master.
xiaoqiang at 9/22/2010 14:07 快速引用
He is very kind in appearance but very rude in heart.


Only coward would behave like this, not people with strong will. And I believe in the good will within everyone.

Enough said for me now.
Bono at 9/22/2010 14:11 快速引用
xiaoqiang :
I am stating a fact.

I see an influential micro-financing web site that he sets up in China. According to him, he is operating in a gray area of the law. He has done similar things in other parts of the world, and in the seminar, some 黑色小白鼠 defends his conducts.

I don't like this guy in person. He is a 童话作家 under the disguise of a cow boy. He is very kind in appearance but very rude in heart. But what he does is common practice.

Luckily he is challenged by one of the old audience and has to close his presentation before the debate got out of control.

Of course, I don't think you can understand these things. No offense but I think it is a waste of time to argue with you.

Bono :
xiaoqiang :


So many experiments to do. The key seems to be to minimize risk. Treat people as 小白鼠 and make them 感恩戴德, that's the definition of philanthropy in the western world.


I strongly disagree. Do you like to be treated as that?

If the answer is no, then I can say 几所不欲,勿施于人.

If the answer is yes, then I don't see the point of minimizing risk. The point should be to maximizing fun for your master.


who is he?
wildcrane at 9/22/2010 14:34 快速引用
先生,我们想念您
Gemini at 9/22/2010 15:17 快速引用
I don't want to mention his real name here.

wildcrane :
xiaoqiang :
I am stating a fact.

I see an influential micro-financing web site that he sets up in China. According to him, he is operating in a gray area of the law. He has done similar things in other parts of the world, and in the seminar, some 黑色小白鼠 defends his conducts.

I don't like this guy in person. He is a 童话作家 under the disguise of a cow boy. He is very kind in appearance but very rude in heart. But what he does is common practice.

Luckily he is challenged by one of the old audience and has to close his presentation before the debate got out of control.

Of course, I don't think you can understand these things. No offense but I think it is a waste of time to argue with you.

Bono :
xiaoqiang :


So many experiments to do. The key seems to be to minimize risk. Treat people as 小白鼠 and make them 感恩戴德, that's the definition of philanthropy in the western world.


I strongly disagree. Do you like to be treated as that?

If the answer is no, then I can say 几所不欲,勿施于人.

If the answer is yes, then I don't see the point of minimizing risk. The point should be to maximizing fun for your master.


who is he?
xiaoqiang at 9/22/2010 15:22 快速引用
你好。

金喜怎么样了?

Gemini :
先生,我们想念您
xiaoqiang at 9/22/2010 15:23 快速引用
xiaoqiang :
I don't want to mention his real name here.

wildcrane :
xiaoqiang :
I am stating a fact.

I see an influential micro-financing web site that he sets up in China. According to him, he is operating in a gray area of the law. He has done similar things in other parts of the world, and in the seminar, some 黑色小白鼠 defends his conducts.

I don't like this guy in person. He is a 童话作家 under the disguise of a cow boy. He is very kind in appearance but very rude in heart. But what he does is common practice.

Luckily he is challenged by one of the old audience and has to close his presentation before the debate got out of control.

Of course, I don't think you can understand these things. No offense but I think it is a waste of time to argue with you.

Bono :
xiaoqiang :


So many experiments to do. The key seems to be to minimize risk. Treat people as 小白鼠 and make them 感恩戴德, that's the definition of philanthropy in the western world.


I strongly disagree. Do you like to be treated as that?

If the answer is no, then I can say 几所不欲,勿施于人.

If the answer is yes, then I don't see the point of minimizing risk. The point should be to maximizing fun for your master.


who is he?


那你发给我一个人嘛,好像你们全都指导说谁呢,就我不知道。 oops
wildcrane at 9/22/2010 15:56 快速引用
我很年轻的时候看过一遍《罗生门》,没看懂。也许该再试一遍。
PHOEBE at 9/22/2010 21:59 快速引用
你继续闭关吧,说不定下回就成佛了。

xiaoqiang :
闭关收获甚多。

又看了一遍罗生门。人确实很好玩,而且很 predictable.

参加了一个 seminar,一位网络前辈说网络 privacy is not important, but dignity is. Very well said. 牛

So many experiments to do. The key seems to be to minimize risk. Treat people as 小白鼠 and make them 感恩戴德, that's the definition of philanthropy in the western world.
rogerlee at 9/22/2010 22:07 快速引用
没咋看懂。直觉不喜欢:

1。Treat people as 小白鼠

2。Make them 感恩戴德
daduzi at 9/22/2010 22:49 快速引用
daduzi :
没咋看懂。直觉不喜欢:

1。Treat people as 小白鼠

2。Make them 感恩戴德

hehe 你在说些什么?

xiaoqiang说的是他根据一个人的讲座归纳出的对西方慈善事业的理解。这未必等同于那个讲座的人自己对慈善的理解,也未必是那个人试图传达出来的意思。这就像无线电信号的发送和接受,哪怕很多人其实是以故意误解为出发点的。为了找到捷径,这种误解也许“不得不”,所以是可以理解的。

我有做慈善的朋友跟我说她的出发点是为世界做自己的贡献。我相信她的说法。很多做慈善的人出发点的确如此。也许到了后来,遇到很多困难和挫折,他们不得不改变初衷。也许有的人看中慈善的幌子从一开始就打算给自己牟取利益。这些都是可能存在的。毕竟任何一个人的所作所为都存在有上千种不同的解释,绝对不是一对一加减法那么直接单纯的事情。

毕竟,你看见的世界就是你自己的内心世界。正如rogerlee所说,成佛也不是很难的。等下次吧。smile

说到电影,看待这个世界的恶意有很多电影。日本人在这方面一向比较强。很久很久以前有个朋友给我推荐《关于丽丽周的一切》。是个值得一看的片子。
pas at 9/25/2010 20:49 快速引用
pas :
daduzi :
没咋看懂。直觉不喜欢:

1。Treat people as 小白鼠

2。Make them 感恩戴德

hehe 你在说些什么?

xiaoqiang说的是他根据一个人的讲座归纳出的对西方慈善事业的理解。这未必等同于那个讲座的人自己对慈善的理解,也未必是那个人试图传达出来的意思。这就像无线电信号的发送和接受,哪怕很多人其实是以故意误解为出发点的。为了找到捷径,这种误解也许“不得不”,所以是可以理解的。

我有做慈善的朋友跟我说她的出发点是为世界做自己的贡献。我相信她的说法。很多做慈善的人出发点的确如此。也许到了后来,遇到很多困难和挫折,他们不得不改变初衷。也许有的人看中慈善的幌子从一开始就打算给自己牟取利益。这些都是可能存在的。毕竟任何一个人的所作所为都存在有上千种不同的解释,绝对不是一对一加减法那么直接单纯的事情。

毕竟,你看见的世界就是你自己的内心世界。正如rogerlee所说,成佛也不是很难的。等下次吧。smile

说到电影,看待这个世界的恶意有很多电影。日本人在这方面一向比较强。很久很久以前有个朋友给我推荐《关于丽丽周的一切》。是个值得一看的片子。


你误解我误解他误解他们。

不管谁说,这两句我就是不喜欢呀不喜欢
daduzi at 9/28/2010 15:40 快速引用
我希望你所说的真实的反应了你的纯洁的内心世界。

抛开复杂的哲学浆糊,在作善事这个方面,这个世界确实只有两种人,分别以OBM和Bush为代表。我认为后者更诚实,造成的危害小一些。

pas :
daduzi :
没咋看懂。直觉不喜欢:

1。Treat people as 小白鼠

2。Make them 感恩戴德

hehe 你在说些什么?

xiaoqiang说的是他根据一个人的讲座归纳出的对西方慈善事业的理解。这未必等同于那个讲座的人自己对慈善的理解,也未必是那个人试图传达出来的意思。这就像无线电信号的发送和接受,哪怕很多人其实是以故意误解为出发点的。为了找到捷径,这种误解也许“不得不”,所以是可以理解的。

我有做慈善的朋友跟我说她的出发点是为世界做自己的贡献。我相信她的说法。很多做慈善的人出发点的确如此。也许到了后来,遇到很多困难和挫折,他们不得不改变初衷。也许有的人看中慈善的幌子从一开始就打算给自己牟取利益。这些都是可能存在的。毕竟任何一个人的所作所为都存在有上千种不同的解释,绝对不是一对一加减法那么直接单纯的事情。

毕竟,你看见的世界就是你自己的内心世界。正如rogerlee所说,成佛也不是很难的。等下次吧。smile

说到电影,看待这个世界的恶意有很多电影。日本人在这方面一向比较强。很久很久以前有个朋友给我推荐《关于丽丽周的一切》。是个值得一看的片子。
xiaoqiang at 9/28/2010 16:31 快速引用
[Time : 0.017s | 11 Queries | Memory Usage: 811.25 KB]