作者 |
留言 |
rogerlee |
发表于: 3/01/2010 00:40 发表主题: |
|
Absaz 写到: |
rogerlee 写到: |
Absaz 写到: |
rogerlee 写到: |
Absaz 写到: |
"大家确实应该多多思考,看能不能出个良策,又让人民能实行监管,又能控制好分寸。也就是说,能否比老毛还要聪明。" |
This is what we should do. Looking back to Mao is to learn from him, not to deny his position in history. |
What if learning from him will deny his position? |
A person's historical position can not be denied unless you rewrite the history or only thinking from your "little circle" and refuse to look at it from a nation or whole people's perspective. I believe we've had a lot of this discussion in a previous Lao Zhu's post. |
You are conflict. If a person's historical position can not be denied, rewriting of history cannot deny it either.  |
我怎麽碰上了一个刁良民。[/quote]
又矛盾了。  |
|
 |
Absaz |
发表于: 3/01/2010 00:15 发表主题: |
|
rogerlee 写到: |
Absaz 写到: |
rogerlee 写到: |
Absaz 写到: |
"大家确实应该多多思考,看能不能出个良策,又让人民能实行监管,又能控制好分寸。也就是说,能否比老毛还要聪明。" |
This is what we should do. Looking back to Mao is to learn from him, not to deny his position in history. |
What if learning from him will deny his position? |
A person's historical position can not be denied unless you rewrite the history or only thinking from your "little circle" and refuse to look at it from a nation or whole people's perspective. I believe we've had a lot of this discussion in a previous Lao Zhu's post. |
You are conflict. If a person's historical position can not be denied, rewriting of history cannot deny it either. [/quote] 我怎麽碰上了一个刁良民。 |
|
 |
rogerlee |
发表于: 2/28/2010 22:14 发表主题: |
|
Absaz 写到: |
rogerlee 写到: |
Absaz 写到: |
"大家确实应该多多思考,看能不能出个良策,又让人民能实行监管,又能控制好分寸。也就是说,能否比老毛还要聪明。" |
This is what we should do. Looking back to Mao is to learn from him, not to deny his position in history. |
What if learning from him will deny his position? |
A person's historical position can not be denied unless you rewrite the history or only thinking from your "little circle" and refuse to look at it from a nation or whole people's perspective. I believe we've had a lot of this discussion in a previous Lao Zhu's post.[/quote]
You are conflict. If a person's historical position can not be denied, rewriting of history cannot deny it either.  |
|
 |
Absaz |
发表于: 2/28/2010 13:05 发表主题: |
|
rogerlee 写到: |
Absaz 写到: |
"大家确实应该多多思考,看能不能出个良策,又让人民能实行监管,又能控制好分寸。也就是说,能否比老毛还要聪明。" |
This is what we should do. Looking back to Mao is to learn from him, not to deny his position in history. |
What if learning from him will deny his position?[/quote]
A person's historical position can not be denied unless you rewrite the history or only thinking from your "little circle" and refuse to look at it from a nation or whole people's perspective. I believe we've had a lot of this discussion in a previous Lao Zhu's post. |
|
 |
rogerlee |
发表于: 2/28/2010 12:15 发表主题: |
|
Absaz 写到: |
"大家确实应该多多思考,看能不能出个良策,又让人民能实行监管,又能控制好分寸。也就是说,能否比老毛还要聪明。" |
This is what we should do. Looking back to Mao is to learn from him, not to deny his position in history.[/quote]
What if learning from him will deny his position? |
|
 |
Absaz |
发表于: 2/28/2010 12:10 发表主题: |
|
"大家确实应该多多思考,看能不能出个良策,又让人民能实行监管,又能控制好分寸。也就是说,能否比老毛还要聪明。"[/quote]
This is what we should do. Looking back to Mao is to learn from him, not to deny his position in history. |
|
 |
rogerlee |
发表于: 2/28/2010 11:54 发表主题: |
|
WoJian 写到: |
...经过运动,人民的主人翁态度得到了空前的高涨。从这点来说,运动,让人民意识到了自己确实是国家的主人,... |
你认为老毛设计的运动,有没有砸烂立法司法和行政这一条的? |
|
 |
WoJian |
发表于: 2/28/2010 08:28 发表主题: |
|
smilhaNew 写到: |
对于祖国的病情相信很多人都很清楚。。。药方也都明白。。。既得利益者多了点。。。 |
这回你说的不错。而我也早就在说了,老毛的英明之处,就在于,既得利益阶层还没出现呢,老毛就已经对他们实行批判了,用运动的方法,想让他们认识到自己的思潮会造成的错误,希望他们经过了下基层去改造,能够了解到人民的疾苦。
这个方法,我现在的判断,是实现了治标,没有实现治本。精英很顽固,隐藏了自己的真实想法,当时表现出来为人民利益着想了,现在却在那里翻案了。所以我只能称赞老毛意识到精英需要管的聪明,却不能肯定运动这种方法对精英的有效性。
而且,运动,是老毛设计的人民民主专政的方法。经过运动,人民的主人翁态度得到了空前的高涨。从这点来说,运动,让人民意识到了自己确实是国家的主人,有着监管领导的权利。这点上的设计,老毛是很成功的。这方面 的成功,和老毛的聪明,还体现在,这种人民民主专政,搞过头的话,就可能会变成反政府的动乱,而老毛能够控制好这种分寸,让人民意识到是与政府,与国家一条心的,反的只是犯路线错误的领导。
所以老朱的担心,也并不是没有道理的。就是失去控制的人民监管,会发展成反政府动乱。不过,我可不赞成老朱话语中所体现出来的极左倾向,体现出来的专制倾向。
但是老朱提出来的问题,大家确实应该多多思考,看能不能出个良策,又让人民能实行监管,又能控制好分寸。也就是说,能否比老毛还要聪明。 |
|
 |
smilhaNew |
发表于: 2/28/2010 07:52 发表主题: |
|
对于祖国的病情相信很多人都很清楚。。。药方也都明白。。。既得利益者多了点。。。 |
|
 |
麦香村之老朱专栏 |
发表于: 2/27/2010 09:50 发表主题: 温家宝真是想“瘟(国)家”了。 |
|
温家宝说,我们能够做到,最根本的是两条,第一条就是公开透明,就要让任何一项行政性支出都进入预算,而且公开让群众知道,接受群众监督;第二条就是民主监督。“我曾经引过在建国前毛泽东主席和黄元培先生说过的一段话解决‘其兴也勃,其亡也乎’的周期律问题,最重要的是民主,只有民主才不会出现人亡政息”。温家宝认为,公款吃喝、公车私用,公费出国,其实也关系到整个反腐败。
中国的问题,首先是体制性问题,是传承了2000多年的封建体制问题,所以首要的和根本的问题不是什么公开透明和民主监督的问题。不解决根本问题,所谓的“公开透明”和“民主监督”会愈加添乱,一如老蒋统治大陆时。老蒋的“共和国”(Republic)之所以垮台,主要是“民主”惹的祸。看看当年毛泽东是怎样赞美美国民主的。现在的中国比老蒋时越来越不遑多让,但只要不让“民主”风行,枪杆子就能保住政权。
温家宝明知党已病重,却不思自治、自救,反而一门心思(1)对外公布“病情”;(2)发动民间“庸医群起”,为党把脉、治病、看护。
治大国若烹小鲜。俺有连环3招,解决中国社会的弊病,易如反掌。
到点得上班做菜,明儿再侃。各位看官先猜猜是哪三招。 |
|
 |